In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel «with your beautiful books» («szép»: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive «your» and the fall marking «with» are marked only on the name. There is also unanimity in the number. For example: Vitabu viwili vitatosha (Two books will suffice), Michungwa miwili itatosha (Two orange trees will suffice), Machungwa mawili yatatosha (Two oranges will suffice). The agreement, which, as above, is based on supra-grammatical figures, is a formal agreement, in contrast to a fictitious agreement based on meaning. Klassifying (linguistic) — A classifique in linguistics, sometimes called a measure word, is a word or morpheme used in some languages to rank the reference index of an accounting nomenen according to its meaning. In languages that have filing cabinets, they are often used when the… Wikipedia`s agreement often adds language redundancy. In addition, the agreement allows, in some languages, to change the order of words without resorting to the persons concerned. In Swahili, with its many classes of names, if the arguments of a verb have different classes, one can use a different order of words from the standard subject-verb object (SVO) because the agreement clearly indicates which words belong to the subject and which words belong to the objects. The frequent types of characteristics that can trigger a grammatical concordance are: the chord is a phenomenon in natural language in which the shape of a word or morphem coalesces with the shape of another word or phrase in the sentence.
For example, in the English phrase John goes Fido every morning, the shape of the «walks» is conditioned by the characteristics of the theme, «John». This can be replaced by «John» by an element with different relevant characteristics, as in We go fido every morning, leading to a change in the form of «walks» to «walks» (or, alternatively, a change from «-s» to an empty morpheme, . The agreement is perhaps the morphosytic phenomenon that arises, because it is the morphological expression of a relationship that most researchers consider a syntactic relationship (although not without dissent; see morphological approaches). In contemporary linguistics, the term agreement is (unfortunately) used to refer alternately to the phenomenon itself and to the hypothetical grammatical mechanism that results. Unless otherwise stated, the term is used here only in the neutral and descriptive theoretical sense. Another point of terminology variability concerns the identity of the grammatical elements that conclude an agreement. Canonically, the term is used to describe the morphological covariance between certain verbal elements in a clause (typically carrying the Tense/Aspect/Morphology) and a nominal argument in the same clause; but the term has also been used to describe many other matings of kovarying elements (for example. B nominates and its adjective modifiers, nouns and their owners, pre/post positions and their supplements, etc.; and more recently, the effects of the tension sequence, pronouns and their precursors, and even the relationship between several negative elements in a single clause; see the re-enrollment agreement as another explanation).